From: Jared Isaacman [mailto:jisaacman@shift4.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 6:02 PM
To: Michael J. Seaman <mseaman@cardconnect.com>
Cc: Taylor Lavery <tlavery@shift4.com>; 'Daniel P. Herbert' <dherbert@cardconnect.com>
Subject: RE: Urgent - Illegal Solicitations

Mike,

I told you solving world peace was easier than this deal ... but I'm still trying. I had some very productive dialogue with [redacted]
and some of the Elavon leadership as well. I just don't see how to cram a square peg in a round hole at this point,
I think we all need a little break from all this - get a fresh perspective.

I do want to make sure we are all on the same page wit the 50+ employees the combined companies have hired around Elavon payment processing and its terminal line in the last 60 days. That is a lot
of new commitment on top of the existing resources we have dedicated to that product offering. I think we all really
need to try and make that work especially when the other potential paths are uncertain.

Best,
Jared

From: Jared Isaacman
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 11:46 AM
To: Michael J. Seaman <mseaman@cardconnect.com>
Cc: Taylor Lavery <tlavery@shift4.com>; 'Daniel P. Herbert' <dherbert@cardconnect.com>
Subject: Re: Urgent - Illegal Solicitations

I am working this Mike. I just hung up with [redacted]. Will be calling [redacted] shortly.
If we can't come out of this without you as a partner...I'm perfectly comfortable riding into
battle with you against everyone. Will keep you posted.

Jared

-------- Original message --------
From: Michael J. Seaman <mseaman@cardconnect.com>
Date: 7/26/20 11:39 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Jared Isaacman <jisaacman@shift4.com>
Cc: Taylor Lavery <tlavery@shift4.com>, 'Daniel P. Herbert' <dherbert@cardconnect.com>
Subject: FW: Urgent - Illegal Solicitations

Jared

Any luck?

Mike

From: Michael J. Seaman
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 10:23 AM
To: 'jisaacman@shift4.com' <jisaacman@shift4.com>
Cc: 'tlavery@shift4.com' <tlavery@shift4.com>; 'Daniel P. Herbert' <dherbert@cardconnect.com>
Subject: Urgent - Illegal Solicitations

Jared,

I have never reached out like this before but this is critically important. We spent a good part of the night last night dealing
with more illegal solicitations of our merchants. Specifically, those in Taylor's group that were calling on clients, getting
referrals/leads- see attached text messages from a prospective merchant in a very large Franchise that we co-developed. We
also have a very upset bank partner, see below.

This is so far beyond the pale of how any semblance of ethical business practices that could occur in the context of a merger
agreement would work and is so reckless that I am completely at a loss for words. What makes it worse is that the culprits
aren't following the legal protocols that they were advised to follow. I'm sure your agreement has severe penalties for soliciting
our customers.

The only remedy here is for you and Taylor to get control, make this stop immediately (i.e. send e-mails/make calls to the team while
we speak) and severely discipline those involved so that they might understand the difference between right and wrong in
the context of a merger or acquisition. And, tell the team that you will pursue severe measures if anyone on your team is
contacting, taking leads and or/ referrals.

It is beyond comprehension that this is occurring while the Agreement between our companies is in place and you and I are
negotiating the terms under which we go forward.

I am available to discuss at your convenience.

Mike

Confidential Treatment has been granted for certain portions of this document pursuant to an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The portions for which such Confidential Treatment has been granted are marked with “***”.

Yesterday
7/25/20,5:39 PM

Hey bro! Don't want to bother you, but
did you make any progress with Nathan
Frost and iPay/Inspire?
Delivered

I did. He won't move on it until after the
close of the deal. He needs to have
everything signed first before he makes
any changes. I may be taking him on as
a rep for all of his Inspire locations.
Just a heads up in case he does reach out

7/25/20, 6:18 PM

Oh ok. So did you give him my cell?
If so, could you please ask
call/Text me?
himDelivered
not to

|11 just realized I'm probably not
supposed to give his number out. If you
text him, he'll respond 100%

From:   Daniel P. Herbert
Sent:   Monday, August 10, 2020 10:46 AM
To:     Jared Isaacman
Cc:     Michael J. Seaman; Brad Herring
Subject:    RE: Elavon Relationships

Jared -We have repeatedly advised Shift4 of its contractual obligations under the various agreements our companies have in place, including
the MA. We also have repeatedly advised, asked, and demanded that Shift4 cease soliciting CardConnect direct customers and partners.
Rather than comply with its contractual obligations, Shift4 has taken actions that clearly violate our agreement.

Frankly, there are a litany of claims that CardConnect could bring at this time. But, we want to be the good guy here.

Thus, we offer a reasonable path for Shift4 to comply with its obligations, a reasonable path for CardConnect to continue to pursue the
transactions contemplated by the MA, and the parties to resolve their disputes.

If you do not think the below is fair, then put yourself in our shoes for a moment. How would you react, after entering into an MA, if your
direct

competitor did the following:

.

Instructed its employees to target and solicit customers/partners of the
other party, including calling customers/partners and taking leads/referrals?
Instructed its employees to try to convert "warm" leads of joint venture partners into the direct business of the soliciting party?
Asked your board to allow it to "poach" customers/partners of the other party?
Continued soliciting customers/partners of the other party after being advised to stop, multiple-times?
Contacted the strategic partner of the other party (Elavon) without copying or advising the other party, to complain and make
disparaging remarks about the other party?

With that in mind, we again offer this reasonable path forward:

.    Agree in principle with the First Amendment;
.    Cease your solicitations;
.    Agree to use reasonable best efforts to complete a transaction;
.    Agree that the MA terminates if we don't sign the First Amendment before a certain date (we're flexible);
.    Agree to mutual releases if we don't proceed; and
.    Agree to pay for the costs CardConnect incurred for the 3rd party valuation and fairness opinion.

I look forward to your response and further discussion of these terms.

Dan

From: Jared Isaacman <jisaacman@shift4.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2020 6:59 PM
To: Daniel P. Herbert <dherbert@cardconnect.com>
Cc: Michael J. Seaman <mseaman@cardconnect.com>; Brad Herring <bherring@shift4.com>
Subject: Elavon Relationships

Dan,

I have shared before that I do not believe this merger is in the best interest of Shift4, CardConnect or it's shareholders. In fact, I
believe it would significantly impair enterprise value for the combined organization by taking a premier, high-growth integrated
payments company and combining it with a merchant portfolio that consists of 50% ISO agent residuals with a 5+ year payback. Still,
I understand that the CardConnect team put in a great amount of effort and commitment into this potential transaction and I do respect
that, I really have tried to get this to work in some form.

I do acknowledge your point made in this email, and in person when we last met, that it would be better to agree now that we are not
able to move forward under favorable terms for all parties involved. I think we all recognize that the original merger agreement is dead
and forcing alignment now in some new form is near impossible. We were happy to entertain modifications to our agreement, as we
have discussed at length, but we certainly will not entertain revisions that are absolutely not aligned with our interests or those of our
shareholders.

I also acknowledge your request to reimburse CardConnect for the ~$200k incurred for the 3'd party valuation of this deal. The only
condition I would ask, that I think is fair, is that the materials are shared with us for review.

In terms of how we best manage the large amount of joint customers we have within the Elavon portfolio, I think we should all be able
to agree that the customers should come first. They chose CardConnect for their merchant acquiring and chose Shift4 for their
payment gateway, point-of-sale and other technology services. We should continue to deliver both without interruption. I recognize
this has been a challenge for CardConnect with the recent departure of many employees to pursue other opportunities. We have tried
to help where our resources allowed. I believe the best option will be for CardConnect to work with us to determine the monthly
revenue of the customers that were supported by the departing employees and develop an acceptable support fee or commission
override schedule. We can also consider working the same arrangement on other merchants within the Elavon portfolio that
CardConnect does not have the resources to support.

From: Daniel P. Herbert <dherbert@cardconnect.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 10:48 AM
To: Jared Isaacman <jisaacman@shift4.com>
Cc: Michael J. Seaman <mseaman@cardconnect.com>; Brad Herring <bherring@shift4.com>
Subject: Confidential Info

Jared -I completely understand the predicament, as I lived a derivative of it at First Data when we had an agreement to be
acquired by Concord.

With that said, I think it is appropriate for Mike and I to come up with creative options, for your consideration, so we can
get the benefits of a deal now. We may also need to involve Elavon counsel, as the First Data counsel did at beginning of
integrating Concord.

In any event, we should continue to explore.

Dan Herbert | Chief Legal Officer
p. 610.930.3339 c. 215.805.0658
e. dherbert@cardconnect.com
www.cardconnect.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are.hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly
prohibited.

```.
**Exhibit 19 (Document 27-20 Case: 2:21-cv-00972-JDW)-text chain image.**