Case 2:17-cv-03965-WB Document 201-6 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 5.
EXHIBIT 6

Case 2:17-cv-03965-WB Document 201-6 Filed 03/08/19 Page 2 of 5
From: Taylor Lavery
To: J. David Oder
Date: July 26, 2017 7:34:49 PM EDT
Can you send that email from Neil about
pricing to me?
From: J. David Oder
To: Taylor Lavery
Date: July 26, 2017 7:34:57 PM EDT
Yes
From: Taylor Lavery
To: J. David Oder
Date: July 27, 2017 4:02:32 PM EDT
Can you also send any emails from Jared
about us not doing well.
Thanks man
From: Taylor Lavery
To: J. David Oder
Date: *July 27, 2017 4:02:49 PM EDT
I owe you a beer..or 12
From: J. David Oder
To: Taylor Lavery
Date: July 27, 2017 4:08:45 PM EDT
Got it. Give me a few and I'Il send what I
have.
From: J. David Oder
To: . Taylor Lavery
Date: July 27, 2017 4:10:29 PM EDT
You are going to owe me a lot more than 12
before this thing is through! Lol

Case 2:17-cv-03965-WB Document 201-6 Filed 03/08/19 Page 3 of 5
From: Taylor Lavery
To: J. David Oder
Date: July 27, 2017 4:10:46 PM EDT
Ha! Deal
From: Taylor Lavery
To: J. David Oder
Date: August 24, 2017 11:34:14 AM EDT
Hey man
Sorry, I just don't trust Jared.
When you get time can you check your email
see if Jared sent anything saying we
defaulted, lost the exclusivity, or our
agreement changed in anyway?
My guy says that he is telling Brian and
possibly others that our deal changed back in
June or July.
From: J. David Oder
To: Taylor Lavery
Date: August 24, 2017 11:37:51 AM EDT
He hasn't, at least not to me or anyone else
that I have been coped on. I just searched my
email for the last 90 days and there is nothing
like that in writing.
From: Taylor Lavery
To: J. David Oder
Date: August 24, 2017 11:38:53 AM EDT
Thanks man. How should I pay you for
this?

Case 2:17-cv-03965-WB Document 201-6 Filed 03/08/19 Page 4 of 5

From: J. David Oder
To: Taylor Lavery
Date: August 24, 2017 11:39:19 AM EDT
We'll figure it out.
From: Taylor Lavery
To: J. David Oder
Date: August 24, 2017 11:39:48 AM EDT
Ok, thanks. Sorry to be a pain man.
From: J. David Oder
To: Taylor Lavery
Date: August 24, 2017 11:55:22 AM EDT
No problem.

Case 2:17-cv-03965-WB Document 201-23 Filed 03/08/19 Page 40 of 47
Slack Messages
Jared Isaacman [5:54 PM]
@channel well it happened again. another merchant was live in micronotes only to find out hours later they wanted
tokenization. CardConnect solution is to repaper the merchant. I have told them repeatedly this does NOT work.
This is so frustrating.
Taylor Lavery [5:58 PM]
What merchant?
Jared Isaacman [5:59 PM]
I dont know yet. @jisaacman is getting the details
Jared Isaacman [5:59 PM]
this happened with a few merchants on monday, most notably that $150k rev premium deal
Taylor Lavery [6:00 PM]
Got it. I just don't know which deal you are talking about. We closed 4 $100K+ deals last week.
Jared Isaacman [6:03 PM]
my point is that CardConnect is not providing a suitable path from Micronotes to all of our other services. I thought
we had a solution and CardConnect just seems to be ignoring it
Taylor Lavery [6:05 PM]
Not accurate. I need the name of the merchant, which I'm working on now, and I'll be able to tell you exactly what
happened. I know some idiot in sales went back to that prospect, told them we would wave all package fees, and
repapered them. But I need to confirm before I get into it.

Jared Isaacman [7:12 AM]
alright, Vegas just confirmed that this merchant repapered another merchant (same idiot repapered the premium deal I
referred to last night). not sure of name. but its getting old
Taylor Lavery [7:13 AM]
Send me the name when you have it. I'll take to sales.
Jared Isaacman [7:13 AM]
ok

Case 2:17-cv-03965-WB Document 201-24 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 2
From: Taylor Lavery
To: J. David Oder
Date: August 16, 2017 8:15:38 PM EDT
Anything change?
From: J: David Oder
To: Taylor Lavery
Date: August 16, 2017 8:15:48 PM EDT
Nope

From: Taylor Lavery <tlavery@firstdata.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 5:41:40 PM
To: Oder, David
Subject: Re: FW: Shift 4

Dave,
I forwarded to Jeff, but he hasn't reviewed.
I'm calling to discuss.

Thanks
Taylor

> On Aug 16, 2017, at 5:34 PM, Oder, David <David.Oder@firstdata.com> wrote:
>
> Did your guy review this?
>
>> On Aug 16, 2017, at 4:20 PM, Lavery, Taylor <tlavery@firstdata.com> wrote:
>>
>> Talk to you on this.
>>
>>> On Aug 16, 2017, at 4:14 PM, J. David Oder <jisaacman@shift4.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: Randy Hyun <rhyun@shift4.com>
>>>> Date: August 16, 2017 at 3:29:12 PM PDT
>>>> To: J. David Oder <jisaacman@shift4.com>
>>>> Subject: Shift 4
>>>>
>>>> FYI, I just received this email. Looks like they are trying to get an answer from me, I wonder what
>>>> First Data World is like:
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Dan, Yoon J" <YoonJ.Dan@firstdata.com>
>>>> Date: Aug 16, 2017 4:35 PM
>>>> Subject:
>>>> To: <rhyun@shift4.com>

Case 2:17-cv-03965-WB Document 201-24 Filed 03/08/19 Page 2 of 2
>>>> Cc:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Randy,
>>>>
>>>> Hope all is well.
>>>>
>>>> Spoke to your CFO, Dave Oder earlier today about expediting and processing the integration
>>>> between CardConnect and Shift4/DOLLARS ON THE NET.
>>>>
>>>> Dave requested an update from you if possible.
>>>>
>>>> Please advise.
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>> Yoon Dan | Information Security - Third Party Risk
>>>> 4000 Coral Ridge Drive | Coral Spring, FL 33065
>>>> Office: 954-602-7143| Mobile:954-254-8288
>>>> yoonj.dan@firstdata.com | firstdata.com

Case 2:17-cv-03965-WB Document 38-5 Filed 11/09/18 Page 4 of 83

A. Right.
Q. And it says at the top:
"From: Taylor Lavery.
"To: J. David Oder.
"Date: July 26, 2017, 7:34:49 PM EDT
"Can you send that email from Neil about pricing
to me?"
A. Uh-huh.
Q. You see that?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And the response from you:
"Yes."
You see that:
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Back to Mr. Lavery:
"Can you also send any emails from Jared about
us not doing well?
"Thanks, man."
And then the next message is:
Oh, actually, that's July 27th. Then
also on -- on July 27th, 2017 at 4:02 and 49 seconds
PM:
"I owe you a beer ... or 12."
Do you see that?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Your response:
"Got it. Give me a few and I'll send what I
have."
You see that?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. And then another message at -- from you
at 4:10:29.
"You are going to owe me a lot more than 12
before this thing is through! Lol"
A. Uh-huh.
Q. You see that?
A. Yes.
Q. And Lavery's response:
"Ha! Deal."
Do you see that?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. All right. Why didn't you report Mr. Lavery
when he sent you these text messages?
MR. FRANKLIN: Objection to form.
A. It wasn't my place.
BY MR. COHEN:
Q. It wasn't your place?

Case 2:17-cv-03965-WB Document 38-5 Filed 11/09/18 Page 5 of 83
1 A. No.
2 Q. Well, are you friends with Mr. Lavery?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. Close friend?
5 A. I'd say we're pretty close, yes.
6 Q. Do you socialize with him outside of the
7 workplace?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Do you go to his wedding?
10 A. I was invited.
11 Q. Did you go?
12 A. No.
13 Q. Okay. So pretty close friend you, but not close
14 enough that you to go his wedding?
15 A. No. He -- I did not go to his wedding. I don't
16 recall the reason why, but I did not go.
17 Q. Okay. But I take it, at a minimum, you wanted to
18 maintain your friendship with Mr. Lavery; right?
19 MR. FRANKLIN: Objection to form.
20 A. Sure. Yeah.
21 BY MR. COHEN:
22 Q. And that played at least some role in you not
23 telling anyone at Shift4 about these text messages;
24 right?
25 MR. FRANKLIN: Objection to form

Case 2:17-cv-03965-WB Document 38-6 Filed 11/09/18 Page 2 of 79
1 right?
2 MR. FRANKLIN: Objection to form.
3 A. I -- I do, yes.
4 BY MR. COHEN:
5 Q. Okay. August 24, 2017, 11:34 AM, message from
6 Taylor Lavery.
7 "Hey man,
8 "Sorry, I just don't trust Jared."
9 "When you get time can you check your emall
10 see if Jared sent anything saying we defaulted, lost
11 the exclusivity, or our agreement changed in anyway?"
12 "My guy says that he is telling Brian and
13 possibly others that our deal changed back in June or

Case 2:17-cv-03965-WB Document 38-6 Filed 11/09/18 Page 4 of 79
1 A. Yes, sir.
2 Q. Do you remember having that conversation?
3 A. I do, sir.
4 Q. What was it about?
5 A. I -- I don't recall.
6 Q. Was he concerned that Jared Isaacman was
7 misrepresenting the nature of the relationship
8 between Shift4 and Card Connect to other people?
9 MR. FRANKLIN: Objection to form.
10 A. I don't know who the "he" is you're referring to,
11 but it -- I don't recall the nature of the
12 conversation at all.
13 BY MR. COHEN:
14 Q. Well, are you -- who is the "my guy"?
15 A. I have no idea.
16 Q. You have no idea who the "my guy" is?
17 A. No.
18 Q. Okay. Do you recall at that time in August of
19 2017 having concerns that Mr. -- excuse me, that
20 Mr. Isaacman was misrepresenting that nature of the
21 agreement or the exclusivity?
22 MR. FRANKLIN: Objection to form.
23 A. Yes.
24 BY MR. COHEN:
25 Q. And did that relate to the exclusivity provision?