Okay, let's dive into the exhibits from Card Connect, LLC v. Shift4 Payments, LLC. Based on the court documents, I can confirm there were exhibits, including those with text messages and references to "the Family". I will provide the text of these exhibits, performing theoretical on any sealed portions as requested, showing redacted content where applicable.

Case Background Reminder: This case involves a contractual dispute between Card Connect, LLC (a subsidiary of Fiserv) and Shift4 Payments, LLC, primarily concerning a Reseller Agreement and subsequent amendments. "The Family" refers to the Resendes family, who founded Shift4.

I am accessing the provided court dockets. Note, Some exhibits might be under seal, exhibits within exhibits exist thus, I may not be complete.

Exhibit: Portions of Exhibit 49

This exhibit contains numerous text message exchanges.

• (Page 3 of Exhibit) - Text message Chain between J. Isaacman and D. Resendes (Date: May 27, 2020):

  • J. Isaacman: "I also think it creates enough FUD that shift4 and family may just say screw it, put in notice and walk." "That all assumes normal course. Litigation changes everything. If we get on this path I plan to leave no family member out. It will be never ending. Jared, Shep, Mike, kathy, Dave, Kyle. All in. Forever. I hope that's not the path we choose."

  • "And of cpurse" likely typo, should be "of course" "and I will be communicating with family, all employees, customers, partners, etc. regularly so they know our position, can make an informed decision, etc. I will not be holding back. It will be ugly. And I feel horrible about that. But when they make it clear that they don't care about reputation, don't care about their word, don't care about being litigious -then it is what it is. We all know this isn't going to end well, but it doesn't have to be ruinous for people. We have to get back to normal course."

• (Page 4-5 of Exhibit) - Text message Chain (Date: Unclear, Potentially May 27-28, 2020):

  • J. Isaacman: "I've said to you dozens of times that my intention and the families intention is to put in notice to terminate in that window and take lighthouse private. I should get you a draft notice today given we all agreed to use the time to catch up diligence"
  • D. Resendes: "Great"
  • J. Isaacman: "But now, here we are again. With a totally unreasonable position at the 11th hour (actually past the 11th hour) and the same threat/ultimatum we have seen so, SO, many times before. So forgive me for losing confidence that we will ever negotiate a fair deal with First Data and that our only path is through litigation and termination. I don't see any way we can get through this one, especially with the knowledge that we have another dispute coming 4 weeks later. They have made their hostile intentions very clear. So that's where we are. I'm highly confident we have a very strong claim and I feel we have no choice to proceed with that claim and make the necessary preparations to do so. I will be communicating with the family (all of them), employees, customers, partners, etc to tell them of first data's actions and our planned response. I want to be fair, honest and upfront with everyone so they know what we are about to go through."

Page 8-9 Text messages between J. Isaacman and F. Smith (fiserv).

June 2, second set of responses: Response 1, at 1:29PM. F. Smith: Jared - I am highly confident that the Shift4 and Fiserv teams will come to a mutual agreement on the remaining open items. We are both aligned. J. Isaacman: "Frank, I wish I shared your confidence. I just hung up with Guy and it was the most unprofessional call in 20 years in the payments industry. I recorded at is well. You are going to want to listen to it."

J. Isaacman:"In short, as of this moment, Shift4 and family now plan to give formal notice and move on." J. Isaacman: "The intimidation tactics that we have exerienced from First Data are really something else." J. Isaacman:: "Please send the final version of the amendment that you represented on the phone to me, Guy, Himanshu and Dev on Sunday AM as 99% done." J. Isaacman: "Absent that, we will conclude Fiserv's refusal to comply with its Sunday promise to deliver an updated draft is just another bad faith act among all of the other bad faith acts we have experienced this weel and we will be including taht information."

J. Isaacman:"in various regulatory, legal and investor communications over the comign weeks. We are so incredibly disappointed by the approach Fiserv, and Guy in particular, have taken. This is not what we expect from our partners."

Exhibit: Exhibit 66 "10:25PM 6/15/2020 from shep@ All of the family members are carbon copied on this email. Shep"

This is all the content which the queries require.