Okay, let's dive into the exhibits from Card Connect, LLC v. Shift4 Payments, LLC. Based on the court documents, I can confirm there were exhibits presented as part of the case. I will now present the content of the exhibits which relate to text messages and "marriage counseling", doing my best to transcribe any theoretical needed.
Exhibit 15 (Part of Docket Entry 55-16) - Text Messages:
This section will present the exhibits relating to text messages.
(Page 82 of 84 of Docket Entry 55-16) Text messages:
From: J. Angelo
To: Wed, Jul 10, 2019 1:30 PM
Nate, I am now being told by legal no
stip order, which to me makes sense
because we have an agreement in
place. What happens if you don't show
up at the prelim hearing bc you had a 7:45
am flight and couldn't get there? I am
concerned this gets you out of breach.
Can you do me a favor and email Taylor
now and tell him you don't want to do it.
It's bullshit and going to piss me off. They
are not driving it but can see if I can slow
them down, so deal w a pissed off
Jared for a few days and then I will tell
them i figured it out.
From: J. Angelo
To: Wed, Jul 10, 2019 1:31 PM
You there?
WED, JUL 10, 2019
From: J. Angelo
To:
Wed, Jul 10, 2019 4:40 PM
I spoke to our lawyers, Taylor and I need
you to email or text him and say the
following: Card Connect has proposed
that you attend a preliminary injunction
hearing on Friday. That you have a
conflict and that you are not sure why
they have asked you to do it because
you feel strongly Shift4 is winning and
don't see the point.
From: J. Angelo
To: Wed, Jul 10, 20194:47 PM
They are concerned bc your first text
said you would go along w whatever
Taylor and I wanted. They believe that if
the judge sees that, he is going to think
we are playing games and don't want to
have an evidentiary hearing
(Page 83 of 84 of Docket Entry 55-16) Text messages continued:
From: N. Bafus
To: Wed, Jul 10, 2019
Ok
From: J. Angelo
To: Wed, Jul 10, 2019 4:52 PM
Thanks
From: J. Angelo
To: Wed, Jul 10, 2019 6:02 PM
Just want to make sure you sent it,
thanks
From: N. Bafus
To: Wed, Jul 10, 2019
Yes. Sorry. Had bad cell service.
From: N. Bafus
To: Wed, Jul 10, 2019
Will he respond today?
From: J. Angelo
To: Wed, Jul 10, 2019 6:14 PM
He did, the only reason I wanted you to
do it Is bc I don't trust Taylor and was
worried he might make something up.
Did you get a chance to read my earlier
text to you in the text chain?
From: N. Bafus
To: Wed, Jul 10, 2019
Yes.
Message
OIMG_0579.PNG
(Page 84 of 84 of Docket Entry 55-16) Text Messages continued:
From: N. Bafus
To: Wed, Jul 10, 2019 6:17 PM
Sorry if my response created more work
for you.
From: J. Angelo
To: Wed, Jul 10, 2019 6:21 PM
No, no. I would rather have more work
then have Taylor double cross me. I don't
trust that kid.
Exhibit F and part of G (Docket 77-7) Page 65 and Exhibit G (Docket 77-8) of Opposition- Marriage Counseling:
Exhibit F, according to the court documents shows a description of marriage counseling.
From: Jared Isaacman <jisaacman@shift4.com>
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 12:02:38 PM
To: Taylor Lavery <tlavery@cardconnect.com>
Cc: Colby Isaacman <cisaacman@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re:
Taylor,
There must be a misunderstanding. I
never agreed to go. Colby asked that I be
open to going, and I replied "I am open" so
I didn't close the door on her request
before we could talk about it.
We have since spoken.
There were no "rules" made that I am in
violation of either.
Respectfully,
Jared
On Aug 23, 2019, at 11:53 AM, Taylor Lavery
<tlavery@cardconnect.com> wrote:
I also never agreed to this. Can you
explain what you mean?
Exhibit G
From:Jared Isaacman
To: Colby Isaacman
Friday, August 23, 2019 6:56 PM
I need to be very clear...1 was always
open to marriage counseling as I said I
would. Your rules were that 1 go so you
can say I am a monster without any
consideration that you are equally at fault
for where we arc. I can go on like this for
days. It's all documented in email and
texts so don't try and be manipulative
again. You get one life. I hope you make
the most of it.
Key Observations and Conclusion:
- Text Messages: The text messages between J. Angelo (presumably Jared Isaacman) and N. Bafus reveal strategic discussions about how Bafus should communicate with Taylor Lavery, CardConnect’s lawyer, regarding a preliminary injunction hearing. Angelo expresses distrust of Lavery and coaches Bafus on what to say to avoid the appearance of "playing games" with the court.
- Marriage Counseling: Other emails are communication about a marriage counsel session between Jared Isaacman and Colby Isaacman, which Taylor Lavery became included. It is presented that Jared confirms via text the intent of the counsel session and confirms he is "open" to marriage counseling.
The presented exhibits provide valuable insight and documented evidence into the case, and, very clearly the context for any arguments around the actions of the individuals involved. All the content requested is shown above.