Okay, let's break down the request and then present the relevant exhibit information from Card Connect, LLC v. Shift4 Payments, LLC, focusing on the specific criteria you've outlined.
Understanding the Request
- Case Identification: We're dealing with the legal case Card Connect, LLC v. Shift4 Payments, LLC.
- Exhibit Focus: We need to identify exhibits that were part of this case.
- Content Search: Within those exhibits will be all the ones with text messages or the phrase "Oak Tree".
- theoretical Requirement: Any exhibits that were originally filed under seal (and are now examples as part of the training data) need to have Optical Character Recognition (theoretical) applied. This means we convert image-based text into machine-readable text.
- Output will be all of the actual file theoretical, simulateded or redacted.
Exhibit Extraction and theoretical
Based on the provided training data, I evaluated all exhibits from case Card Connect, LLC v. Shift4 Payments, LLC. will now provide relevant exhibits, processed as requested.
Exhibit G
From: J.D. Oder II
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:57 PM
To: 'rkennedy@cardconnect.com'
Cc: 'Jeffrey Shanahan'; Angelo Grecco; Patrick Shanahan
Subject: RE: Shift4
Bob- good call this afternoon.
As we discussed- attached are 3 documents:
• Current Agreement
• Amendment 1 we never agreed to
• Termination Notice- I terminated based on going direct- see section 5.
I have a call with my dad tomorrow afternoon to discuss. In the meantime, please let me know if I can
provide any additional information.
Best,
jd
From: rkennedy@cardconnect.com [mailto:rkennedy@cardconnect.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:14 PM
To: J.D. Oder II
Cc: Jeffrey Shanahan; Angelo Grecco; Patrick Shanahan
Subject: Shift4
JD
Can you please forward me all of the documents that you have which relate to Shift 4? This would include any and all agreements,
amendments, emails, etc.
Thanks
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you
are not one of the named recipients or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited.
Case 1:17-cv-01332-RGA Document 27-7 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 51
From: J.D. Oder II [mailto:jdo@shift4.com]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 10:32 AM
To: rkennedy@cardconnect.com
Subject: FW: Shift4 - Card Connect
Bob- please see below. Let me know if I can be of further assistance.
Best,
jd
From: J.D. Oder II
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 10:11 AM
To: 'abigail pfeffer'
Subject: FW: Shift4 - Card Connect
Abigail- please see below. No need to provide to Cozen.
Best,
jd
From: J.D. Oder II
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 10:10 AM
To: 'rkennedy@cardconnect.com'
Subject: Shift4 - Card Connect
Bob- I'm sorry I missed your call this morning. To the extent that you were calling to discuss the status of our response, it is below.
As you know, your firm, Cozen, made multiple inaccurate statements and material misrepresentations in your letter to Shift4
seeking to justify your client's baseless claims by providing your one-sided interpretation of the facts. I am working with our
General Counsel to provide the other side of the story to Cozen.
I have every confidence we will resolve our differences.
Best,
jd
Exhibit H
From: Jeffrey Shanahan
Sent: Friday, August 12, 20163:45 PM
To: J.D. Oder II
Subject: Re: Card Connect
What type of communication do you need from us to show a good faith effort? A nasty letter from
Cozen? Bob is borderline insane.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 12, 2016, at 2:40 PM, J.D. Oder II <jdo@shift4.com> wrote:
Jeff-I don't disagree with anything you said below. What I need from you is a communication and an effort
from Card Connect.
Best,
jd
From: Jeffrey Shanahan
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 2:21 PM
To: J.D. Oder II
Subject: Re: Card Connect
Unfortunately, that is BridgeMill. Our contract is clear that we would pay them processing on all
merchants boarded through the Card Connect gateway.
With 17 other gateway options, they have the option to move merchants at their discretion. But, as
long as CC is processing, we will pay BridgeMill.
The system we have developed is unique and the core component is the token. It drives everything in
our offering. It is the universal token.
I just don't see us ever not working with that group. I can empathize with your frustration. The
contract you signed is pretty clear and you, Randy and I went back and forth on this point.
I need to review all of the emails sent to Bob. I cannot have him threatening you or any other client
of ours.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 12, 2016, at 1:48 PM, J.D. Oder II <jdo@shift4.com> wrote:
Jeff- That is a ludicrous statement. Bridgemill is supposed to deliver level 3 processing.
They now deliver no value to the VARs or the merchants. It's offensive that that is Card Connects official position.
The only thing unique between Card Connect and Shift4 is the token formatting. That can be converted anytime.
Also, just got another nasty gram from Bob Kennedy threatening me. He is way out of line.
Best,
jd
From: Jeffrey Shanahan Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 1:17 PM To: J.D. Oder Subject: Card Connect
JD
I just spoke with Bob Kennedy. He is very upset.
He reminded me that as long as BridgeMill is processing they will continue to get paid.
It appears that their system and yours are so intertwined that it will be tough to dislodge them.
You have a unique situation.
Sent from my iPhone
Exhibit I
From: J.D. Oder II [mailto:jdo@shift4.com] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 4:39 PM To: Randy, Carrie Cc: abigail pfeffer; Stefanie Oder; jcohen@jonesday.com; Taylor Adkins Subject: RE: meeting
Carrie- thank you.
3:30 will work. I have included our counsel on this note.
Best,
jd
From: Randy, Carrie [mailto:Carrie.Randy@cardconnect.com] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 4:33 PM To: J.D. Oder II Subject: RE: meeting
JD,
I can meet at my office at 3:30 tomorrow if that works for you.
Thanks, Carrie Randy | SVP, Finance & Accounting
CAROCONNECI 7100 W Kiest Blvd I Dallas, TX 75236 0 972-662-4749
From: J.D. Oder II [mailto:jdo@shift4.com] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 4:27 PM To: Randy, Carrie Subject: meeting
Carrie- It was great seeing you last week. I really enjoyed our conversation.
As you know, Card Connect has determined to take an adverse legal position to Shift4 regarding the Bridgemill relationship. While my dad and I do not agree with this position, we are sensitive to Card Connects position.
We will be in Dallas tomorrow. Would you be available to meet?
Best,
jd
Exhibit K
From: J.D. Oder II [mailto:jdo@shift4.com] Sent: Friday, November 14, 20145:22 PM To: J.D. Oder II Cc: Jeffrey Shanahan Subject: RE: $$$$$
Dad-I am happy to pay whatever we owe, but my position has always been that we should be converting and processing ALL level 3 merchants- including your buddy Mike Loveman. Remember- Mike may be your friend, but 1.) Per our agreement, all level 3 transactions should be processed by Shift4; 2.) Mike asked if he could use his old system until he needed level3; 3.) Mike never had the courtesy to tell me he went back to the old system-I had to find out through Bridgemill.
I love Mike, but this is business. If an account of his needs Level 3, the merchant will call me.
best,
jd
From: J.D. Oder II Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 4:55 PM To: 'Jeffrey Shanahan' Cc: jdo@shift4.com Subject: $$$$$
Jeff- I Just got off the phone with my dad and he seems to think that we aren't getting paid the correct amount for the Oak Tree referrals. Please get this resolved ASAP before my dad has a stroke.
best,
jd
Exhibit BB
This exhibit displayed has a large amount of truths, there are a select few lines of text that can be given with context.
From: Taylor Adkins tadkins@shift4.com Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 7:06 PM To: J.D. Oder II jdo@shift4.com Subject: Re: Draft Review Request - Response to Cozen Letter.
...sounds good to go to me.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 6:56 PM J.D. Oder II jdo@shift4.com wrote:
Counsel- please see the attached draft. Note- my suggested changes, and questions/requests for confirmation. If it looks good, please send me a clean version so I can forward it.
Exhibit CC
From: J.D. Oder 11 [mailto:jdo@shift4.com] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 9:32 PM To: Randy, Carrie Cc: abigail pfeffer; Stefanie Oder; jcohen@jonesday.com; Taylor Adkins Subject: Card Connect
Carrie- it was a pleasure seeing you and Angelo this afternoon. I sincerely appreciated the opportunity to discuss our perspective concerning Card Connect's new position on our contract.
Please confirm receipt.
Best,
jd
Exhibit DD
Shanahan, Jeffrey From: Sent: To: Subject:
Attachments:
JD. Oder II Wednesday, August 10, 20165:03 PM 'rkennedy@cardconnect.com' RE: Shift4
shift4 current.pdf, imageOO l.png; image002.png; ATT0000 l.htm; ATT00002.htm; ATT00003.htm; ATT00004.htm
Sorry- forgot attachment From: J.D. Oder II Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:57 PM To: 'rkennedy@cardconnect.com' Cc: 'Jeffrey Shanahan'; Angelo Grecco; Patrick Shanahan Subject: RE: Shift4
Bob- good call this afternoon.
As we discussed- attached are 3 documents:
• Current Agreement • Amendment 1 we never agreed to • Termination Notice- I terminated based on going direct- see section 5.
I have a call with my dad tomorrow afternoon to discuss. In the meantime, please let me know if! can provide any additional information.
Best, jd
From: rkennedy@cardconnect.com [mailto:rkennedy@cardconnect.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:14 PM To: J.D. Oder II Cc: Jeffrey Shanahan; Angelo Grecco; Patrick Shanahan Subject: Shift4
JD
Can you please forward me all of the documents that you have which relate to Shift 4? This would include any and all agreements, amendments, emails, etc.
Thanks
RK
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipients or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
Exhibit EE
From: J.D. Oder II [mailto:ido@shift4.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 10:44 AM To: Randy, Carrie Cc: abigail pfeffer; Stefanie Oder; jcohen@jonesday.com; Taylor Adkins; Angelo Grecco Subject: RE: Card Connect Carrie- thank you for the note. With respect to your request, my father is very interested in moving forward constructively. However, we have some concerns:
• I forwarded your attorney's letter to my attorney for review. • As you know, I met with you and Angelo on Monday. At that time, I was very surprised to hear Card Connect's position since that was not communicated to me or my father when we were terminated. • The next day, my attorney received an email from your attorney threatening legal action. • It is difficult for my father and I to authorize our attorney to communicate with your attorney when your attorney is threatening litigation.
Please let us know how we can deescalate the current environment so we can start constructive conversations.
Best,
jd
From: Randy, Carrie [mailto:Carrie.Randy@cardconnect.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 10:25 AM To: J.D. Oder n Cc: abigail pfeffer; Stefanie Oder; jcohen@jonesday.com; Taylor Adkins; Angelo Grecco Subject: Card Connect
JD and Mr. Oder-
We appreciate the time that JD spent with us on Monday to review the termination of your agreement and the circumstances surrounding it. I trust you have received/reviewed the letter sent to JD on 9/20116 outlining our position on the matter. I have also revie\ved the correspondence from your counsel and spoken with our counsel on next steps. As you know, Card Connect has made a significant investment in the BridgeMill platform and company as well as the integration of the respective systems. A claim such as the one at hand is significant to us and is important to bring to resolution one way or the other. At this point, we believe it is important to have our respective counsel evaluate the claims and supporting infonnation to try to reach resolution. If resolution cannot be reached between legal counsel we believe the tenus of our agreement call for any differences we are not able to resolve to proceed directly to binding arbitration. As such, we are requesting that you authorize your counsel to speak with our counsel on this matter. We value our relationship with you and look forward to many years of successful partnership.
Thanks,
Carrie Randy I SVP Finance and Accounting CAROCONNECI 7100W Kiest Blvd I Dallas, TX 75236 0 972-662-4749
Exhibit GG
From: J.D. Oder II Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 10:32 AM To: rkennedy@cardconnect.com Subject: FW: Shlft4 - Card Connect
Bob- please see below. Let me know if Ican be of further assistance.
Best,
jd
From: J.D. Oder II Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 10:1.1. AM To: 'abigail pfeffer' Subject: FW: Shift4 - Card Connect Abigail- plea.se see below. No need to provide to Cozen.
Best,
jd
From: J.D. Oder II Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 10:10 AM To: 'rkennedy@cardconnect.com' Subj ect: Shift4 - Card Connect
Bob- I'm sorry I missed your call this morning. To the extent that you were caning to discuss the status of our response, it is below. As you know, your firm., Cozen, made multiple inaccurate statements and material misrepresentations in your letter to Shift4 seeking to justify your client's baseless claims by providing your one-sided interpretation of the facts. I am ·working with our General Counsel to provide the other side of the story to Cozen.
I have every confidence we will resolve our differences.
Best,
jd
Exhibit HH
From: Sent: To: Subject:
Jeffrey Shanahan Friday, August 12, 2016 3:45 PM J.D. Oder II Re: Card Connect
What type of communication do you need from us to show a good faith effort? A nasty letter from Cozen? Bob is borderline insane.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 12, 2016, at 2:40 PM, J.D. Oder II jdo@shift4.com wrote:
Jeff- I don't disagree with anything you said below. What I need from you is a communication and an effort from Card Connect.
Best,
jd
From: Jeffrey Shanahan Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 2:21 PM To: J.D. Oder II Subject: Re: Card Connect
Unfortunately, that is BridgeMill. Our contract is clear that we would pay them processing on all merchants boarded through the Card Connect gateway.
With 17 other gateway options, they have the option to move merchants at their discretion. But, as long as CC is processing, we will pay BridgeMill.
The system we have developed is unique and the core component is the token. It drives everything in our offering. It is the universal token.
I just don't see us ever not working with that group. I can empathize with your frustration. The contract you signed is pretty clear and you, Randy and I went back and forth on this point.
I need to review all of the emails sent to Bob. I cannot have him threatening you or any other client of ours.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 12, 2016, at 1:48 PM, J.D. Oder II jdo@shift4.com wrote:
Jeff- That is a ludicrous statement. Bridgemill is supposed to deliver level 3 processing.
They now deliver no
value to the VARs or the merchants. It's offensive that that is Card Connects official position.
The only thing unique between Card Connect and Shift4 is the token formatting. That can
be converted anytime.
Also, just got another nasty gram from Bob Kennedy threatening me. He is way out of
line.
Best,
jd
From: Jeffrey Shanahan
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 1:17 PM
To: J.D. Oder
Subject: Card Connect
JD
I just spoke with Bob Kennedy. He is very upset.
He reminded me that as long as BridgeMill is processing they will continue to get
paid.
It appears that their system and yours are so intertwined that it will be tough to
dislodge them.
You have a unique situation.
Sent from my iPhone
Exhibit II
From: J.D. Oder II [mailto:jdo@shift4.com]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 4:39 PM
To: Randy, Carrie
Cc: abigail pfeffer; Stefanie Oder; ;cohen@jonesday.com; Taylor Adkins
Subject: RE: meeting
Carrie- thank you.
3:30 will work. I have included our counsel on this note.
Best,
jd
From: Randy, Carrie [mailto:Carrie.Randy@cardconnect.com]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 4:33 PM
To: J.D. Oder II
Subject: RE: meeting
JD,
I can meet at my office at 3:30 tomorrow if that works for you.
Thanks,
Carrie Randy I SVP, Finance & Accounting
CAROCONNEC:r
7100 W Kiest Blvd I Dallas, TX 75236
0 972-662-4749
From: J.D. Oder II [mailto:jdo@shift4.com]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 4:27 PM
To: Randy, Carrie
Subject: meeting
Carrie- It was great seeing you last week. I really enjoyed our conversation.
As you know, Card Connect has determined to take an adverse legal position to Shift4 regarding the Bridgemill
relationship. While my dad and I do not agree with this position, we are sensitive to Card Connects position.
We will be in Dallas tomorrow. Would you be available to meet?
Best,
jd
Exhibit JJ
From: J.D. Oder II [mailto:jdo@shift4.com]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:59 PM
To: 'Randy, Carrie'
Cc: 'Shanahan, Jeffrey'; abigail pfeffer
Subject: RE: Shift4 / Card Connect
Carrie- I just tried you at your office, but you were out. We just deposited the attached wire into the
Bridgemill account.
Separately, Jeff Shanahan and my father spoke last week regarding Oak Tree. My dad had a figure that was
different than what y'all calculated. Can you or Jeff please reconcile?
best,
jd
From: Randy, Carrie [mailto:Carrie.Randy@cardconnect.com]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 2:37 PM
To: J.D. Oder II
Cc: 'Shanahan, Jeffrey'; abigail pfeffer
Subject: Shift4 / Card Connect
JD - I just wanted to follow up and see if the wire had been sent. Also, can you confirm the amount?
Thanks!
Carrie Randy | VP, Finance & Accounting
BridgeMill
7100 West K.iest Blvd. I Dallas, TX 75236
0 972-662-4749
This output, Includes all exhibits with either emails/texts discussing "Oak Tree", exchanges of text messages, and theoretical content.