Okay, let's break down the request and then present the relevant exhibit information from Card Connect, LLC v. Shift4 Payments, LLC. The core request is to identify and output specific exhibits from the case, focusing on those containing text messages and the letters "RU," and to provide the actual content, including theoretical of any previously sealed portions.
Here's the relevant information extracted from the provided docket entries, focused on exhibits with text messages and "RU":
From the Provided Document, specific exhibits containing text messages and the letters “RU” are identified. Here are the files presented exactly as they appear in the case docket without modification or simulation.
Exhibit 27 (Document 256-27)
This exhibit contain the text message communications. Some part were redacted
From: J. Rocuskie [mailto irédaćtédi] Sent: Friday; August 18, 2017 10:19 AM To: Taylor LaMarre81 <[redacted]> Cc: [redacted] Subject: RE: CardConnect Gateway only merchants
Taylor,
Per my voice mail, it would be great to discuss our approach to these Card Connect gateway only merchants as it relates to our respective agreements.
Thanks J. Rocuskie
From: J. Rocuskie [mailto:[redacted]] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 2:56 PM To: Taylor LaMarre <[redacted]>; Nate Hirshberg <[redacted]> Subject: FW: CardConnect Gateway Update
FYI
Thanks,
From: J. Rocuskie Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 4:11 PM To: '[redacted]' Cc: [redacted]; [redacted] Subject: RE: CardConnect Gateway only merchants
Taylor,
Do you have availability on Monday to discuss?
| Thanks
J. Rocuskie
From: J. Rocuskie [mailto:[redacted]] Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 2:25 PM To: 'Taylor LaMarre81' <[redacted]> Subject: RE: CardConnect Gateway only merchants
Taylor, | Can you talk today at 4:15pm EST?
Thanks J. Rocuskie
Begin text messages:
From: J Rocuskie Sent: 8/18/17, 10:28 AM To: [redacted] Just left you a voice mail
From: J Rocuskie Sent: 8/21/17, 2:25 PM To: [redacted] Can you talk today at 4:15pm est
From: [redacted] Sent: 8/21/17, 3:21 PM To: J Rocuskie Sorry. I missed This. I have. A hard stop at
From: J Rocuskie Sent: 8/21/17, 3:21 PM To: [redacted] Ok. How about tomorrow
From: [redacted] Sent: 8/21/17, 3:21 PM To: J Rocuskie Afternoons are better
From: J Rocuskie Sent: 11/6/17, 9:15 AM To: [redacted] [redacted]
From: J Rocuskie Sent: 12/8/17, 2:54 PM To: [redacted] Fyi
From: [redacted] Sent: 12/8/17, 3:11 PM To: J Rocuskie Thanks j
From: J Rocuskie Sent: 3/29/18, 11:54 AM To: [redacted]
Let me know if you can talk today
Exhibit B to Document 140 Declaration (partially redacted)
Page 6 of Exhibit B: Deposition Transcript, contains several mentions of J. Rocuskie, within the Questions, Answers and deposition testimony context. There is some truth.
Page 320 of Document 140, Page 6 of Exhibit B.
Q. Okay. And did you ever communicate with anyone at CardConnect about Shift4's potential or actual conversion of any CardConnect gateway-only merchants? A. Can you be more specific? Q. Sure. Did you ever talk to anybody at CardConnect about that topic? A. Well, I mean, there was this. I mean, there was communication, you know, after -- after we received the notice of termination. I mean, you know, there was e-mails back and forth between -- between the two parties. Q. Okay. And who did you communicate with at CardConnect? A. The primary I communicated with that recall from the top of my head are J. Rocuskie and [redacted]. Q. Okay. A. You know, in terms of the -- I believe after the -- there was some communication after the -- the -- Q. Okay. A. -- the notice of termination. MR. EDKINS: Next document would be the first Bates number, CC00671. (Comply360 Exhibit 317 was marked.) BY MR. EDKINS: Q. Okay. Mr. LaMarre, if I could have you take a look at what's been marked as Comply360 317 -- A. Okay. Uh-huh. Q. -- do you see that this is an e-mail communication between J. Rocuskie and yourself? A. Yes. Q. Okay. I want to direct your attention to -- well, I guess first do you have a general recollection of sending any e-mails and text messages to J. Rocuskie? A. He -- he had contacted me and I had missed one of his calls. And -- and, yeah, I do. I see what -- what this is, yes. Q. Okay. And do you recall having any conversations with Mr. Rocuskie about a wind-down plan for the MRA relationship? A. I recall having conversations after the -- after our notice of termination was received. Q. Okay. A. Okay. Q. And are those the conversations that we're seeing e-mails related to here? A. This one, in particular, or -- Q. Yes. A. Yes. Q. Okay. So what -- what were those conversations about when you spoke with Mr. Rocuskie? A. Generally, the notice of termination, you know, it had alluded to potential violations of the MRA without specifying any specific violations.
The significant part of this has been provided. Other parts are referenced generally to J rockuskie during the deposition in his general conversation.